|
|
|
|
|
|
![](/cyprusexplorer/includes/images/kolossi200x90.jpg) |
|
|
uses Google technology and indexes
only and selectively internet - libraries
having books with free public access |
|
![](/cyprusexplorer/includes/images/chirocit200x200.jpg) |
|
|
![](/cyprusexplorer/includes/images/kourion200x140.jpg) |
|
|
|
|
Previous | |
Next |
|
![](/_images/8x8.gif) |
SIR SAMUEL WHITE BAKER
CYPRUS AS I SAW IT IN 1879
page 16 View PDF version of this page addition to our Colonial Empire of a valuable island, that would not only have been of strategical value, but such that in a few years, money and British settlers would have entirely changed its present aspect, and have created for it a new era of prosperity.
If England had purchased Cyprus, I could have understood the plain, straightforward, business-like transaction, which would have at once established confidence, both among the inhabitants, who would have become British subjects ; and through the outer world, that would have acknowledged the commencement of a great future.
But, if we were actually bound in defensive alliance with Turkey in case of a war with Russia, why should we occupy Cyprus upon such one-sided and anomalous conditions, that would frustrate all hopes of commercial development, for the sake of obtaining a strategical position that would have been opened to our occupation as an ally at any moment ? On the other hand, if we distrusted Turkey, and feared that she might coquet with Russia at some future period, I could see a paramount necessity for the occupation of Cyprus, and even Egypt ; but we were supposed to be, and I believe were, acting in absolute and mutual good faith as the protector of Asiatic Turkey, in defensive alliance with the Sultan. In that position, should we have entered into a war with Russia, there was no necessity for the occupation and responsibility of any new position, as every port of the Ottoman
View PDF version of this page
|
![](/_images/8x8.gif) |
|
Previous |
First |
Next |
|
|
|